Wednesday, 28 May 2025

28 MAY – ROGATION WEDNESDAY

Dom Prosper Gueranger:
During these three days we seem to have forgotten that the time of separation is close upon us, but no — the thought of our coming trial has often presented itself, and the humble supplications we have been presenting to Heaven, in union with holy Church, have prepared us to celebrate the last mystery achieved by our Emmanuel on Earth. The Disciples are all assembled in Jerusalem. They are grouped around the Blessed Mother, in the Cenacle, awaiting the hour when their divine Master is to appear to them for the last time. Recollected and silent, they are reflecting upon all the kindness and condescension He has been lavishing on them during the last forty days. They are ruminating on the instructions they have received from His sacred lips. They know Him so well now! They know in very deed that He came out from the Father (John xvii. 8) As to what regards themselves, they have learned from Him what their mission is: they have to go, ignorant men as they are, and teach all nations (Matthew xxviii. 19), but, sad thought! He is about to leave them. Yet a little while and they will not see Him (John xvi. 16).
What a contrast between their sorrow and the smiling face of nature, which is decked out in her best, for she is going to celebrate the triumphant departure of her Creator! The earth is blooming with the freshness of her first-fruits, the meadows have put on their richest emerald, the air is perfumed with blossom and flower, and all this loveliness of Spring is due to the bright sun that shines on the earth to give her gladness and life, and is privileged to be, both by its kingly splendour and the successive phases of its influence upon our globe, the grand symbol of our Emmanuel’s passage through this world. Let us go back in thought to the dismal days of the winter solstice. The sun looked then so pallid. His triumph over night was slow and short. He rose and sank again, often without our seeing him. His light had a certain timid reserve about it, and his heat was, for weeks, too feeble to rescue nature from the grasp of frost. Such was our divine Sun of Justice, when first He came on earth. His rays made but little way in the world’s thick gloom. He kept His splendour in, lest men should be dazzled by too sudden a change from darkness to light. Like the material sun, He gained upon the world by slow advances, and even so, His progress was shrouded by many a cloud. His sojourn in the land of Egypt, His hidden life at Nazareth, were long periods of His being wholly lost sight of. But when the time came for Him to show Himself, His glory shone forth with all its magnificence on Galilee and Judea. He spoke as one having power (Matthew vii. 29). His works bore testimony to His being God (John x. 25), and the people hailed Him with the cry of “Hosanna to the Son of David!”
He was almost at the zenith of His glory when suddenly came the eclipse of His Passion and Death. For some hours His enemies flattered themselves that they had for ever put out His light. Vain hope! On the third day our divine Sun triumphed over this final obstruction, and now stands in the firmament, pouring out His light upon all creation, but warning us that His course is run. For He can never descend. There is no setting for Him, and here finishes the comparison between Himself and the orb of day. It is from heaven itself that he, our beautiful Orient is henceforth to enlighten and direct us, as Zachary foretold at the birth of the Baptist (Luke I. 79). The Royal Prophet, too, thus exultingly sang of Him: “He has rejoiced as a giant, to run the way: his going out is from the highest heaven, and his circuit even to the summit thereof: and there is no one that can hide himself from his heat” (Psalms xviii. 6, 7).
This Ascension which enthroned our Emmanuel as the eternal centre of light was, by His own decree, to take place on one of the days of the month which men call May, and which clothes, in its richest beauty, the creation of this same God, who, when He had made it, was pleased with it, and found it very good (Genesis i. 31) Sweet month of May! Not gloomy and cold like December, which brought us the humble joys of Bethlehem: not lowering and clouded like March, when the Lamb was sacrificed on Calvary — but buoyant with sunshine, and flowers, and life, and truly worthy to be offered, each year, to Mary, the Mother of God, for it is the month of her Jesus’ triumph.
JESUS, our Creator and Brother! Our eyes and heart have followed you from your first rising upon our world. We have celebrated, in the holy Liturgy, each of your giant steps. But our very seeing you thus ever growing in beauty and brightness told us that you must one day leave us, to go and take possession of the place that was alone worthy of you — the throne at the right hand of your Eternal Father. The splendour that has been on you since your Resurrection is not of this world. You can no longer abide among us. You have remained here below for these forty days only for the sake of consolidating your work, and tomorrow, the earth that has been blessed with your presence for three and thirty years, will be deprived of its privilege and joy. We rejoice at your approaching triumph, as did your Blessed Mother, your Disciples, Mary Magdalene and her companions, but we are sad at the thought of losing you — and you will forgive us. You were our Emmanuel, our God with us: henceforth you are to be our Sun, our King, reigning from the throne of Heaven, and we will no longer be able to hear you, nor see you, nor touch you, Word of Life! Still, dearest Jesus, we say to you with all our hearts: “Glory and love be to you, for you have treated us with infinite mercy! You owed nothing to us. We were unworthy of a single look from you, and yet you came down to this sinful earth, you have dwelt among us, you have hast paid our ransom by your Blood, you have re-established Peace between God and man. Oh, yes, it is most just that you should now return to Him that sent you (John xvi. 5). The Church, your Spouse, consents to her exile. She only thinks of what is most glorious to her Jesus, and she thus addresses you, in the words of the Canticle: “Flee away, O my Beloved! and be swift as the roe and as the young hart, and ascend to the mountains, where the flowers of heaven exhale their sweet fragrance!” (Canticles viii. 14) Can we, poor sinners as we are, refuse to imitate this loving resignation of her, who is your Spouse, and our Mother.

Tuesday, 27 May 2025

27 MAY – SAINT BEDE THE VENERABLE (Priest)


The Reverend Sabine Baring-Gould:
Bede was born in 672 or 673 near the place where Benedict Biscop soon afterwards founded the religious house of Wearmouth, perhaps in the parish of Monkton, which appears to have been one of the earliest endowments of the monastery. As soon as he had reached his seventh year, Bede was sent to Wearmouth, and then to Jarrow, to profit by the teaching of Biscop, from which period to his death he continued to be an inmate of the later monastery.

After the death of Benedict Biscop, Bede pursued his studies under his successor Ceolfrid and, at the age of nineteen, about 692, was admitted to deacon’s orders by Saint John of Beverley, then newly restored to his see of Hexham, and in his thirtieth year he was ordained to the priesthood by the same prelate. The early age at which Bede received holy orders shows that he was then already distinguishing himself by his learning and piety, and there can be little doubt that his fame was widely spread before the commencement of the eighth century. At that period, according to that account which has been generally received, Bede was invited to Rome by Pope Sergius I to advise with that pontiff on some difficult points of church discipline. The authority for this circumstance is a letter of the pope to Ceolfrid, expressing his wish to see Bede at Rome, which has been inserted by William of Malmesbury in his History of England. It seems, however, nearly certain that Bede did not go to Rome on this occasion, and reasons have been stated for supposing the whole story, as far as Bede was concerned in it, to be a misrepresentation. If Bede was invited, we may suppose that the death of the pope the same year in which the letter was sent released him from the labours of the journey.
The remainder of Bede’s life appears to have passed in the tranquillity of study. He clung through life to the dear retreat that was his home, and within its peaceful walls composed his numerous books. But occasionally he went forth to other religious houses for brief visits. In 733 he spent some days in the monastery of York in company with his friend, Archbishop Egbert, but he declined another invitation from the same prelate towards the close of 734 on the plea of ill health, in a letter still preserved. Bede was at this time labouring under an asthmatic complaint which shortly afterwards carried him from the scene of his mortal labours. It is evident from various passages of his works that his days and nights were divided between the studies and researches which he pursued to his last hour, and the instructions he gave to the six hundred monks of Wearmouth and Jarrow. An existence more completely occupied it would be difficult to imagine. Except during the course of his last illness, he had no assistant in his work. “I am my own secretary,” he said, “I dictate, I compose, I copy all myself.”
His greatest work, that most precious to Englishmen, is unquestionably his Ecclesiastical History of England, our chief, almost our only authority for the early history of Christianity in our island. He was urged to undertake this by Albinus, abbot of Saint Augustine’s, Canterbury. Albinus furnished him with memoranda of all that had happened in Kent and the neighbouring counties in the time of the missionaries sent by Saint Gregory. He even sent a priest to Rome to search the archives of the Roman Church, with the permission of Gregory II, for the letters of his predecessors and other documents relative to the mission to England. All the bishops of England also assisted in the work by transmitting to the author what information they could collect concerning the origin of the faith in their dioceses. The abbots of the most important monasteries also furnished their contingent.

This pleasant and glorious life was not, however, without a cloud. He excited the criticism of narrow spirits. They even went so far as to treat him as a heretic because he had in his Chronology combated the general opinion that the world would last only six thousand years. He grew pale with surprise and horror, as he says to one of his friends in an apologetic letter which he charges his correspondent to read to Wilfrid, bishop of York, who seems to have given a certain encouragement to the slander by suffering it to pass in his hearing unrebuked. If, however, he had some enemies, he had more friends. Among these, in the first rank, it is pleasant to find the Celtic monks of Lindisfarne. Bede asks that his name should be inscribed on the roll of monks in the monastery founded by Saint Aidan. He especially desired this favour in order that his soul after death might have a share in the Masses and prayers of that numerous community, as if he had been one of themselves.
The details of his last sickness and death have been revealed to us in minute detail by an eye-witness, the monk Cuthbert:
“Nearly a fortnight before Easter (17th April, 734) he was seized by an extreme weakness in consequence of his difficulty of breathing, but without great pain. He continued thus till the Ascension (26th May), always joyous and happy, giving thanks to God day and night, and even every hour of the night and day. He gave us our lessons daily, and employed the rest of his time in chanting psalms, and passed every night, after a short sleep, in joy and thanksgiving, but without closing his eyes. From the moment of awaking he resumed his prayers and praises to God, with his arms outstretched as a cross. O happy man! He sang sometimes texts from Saint Paul and other scriptures, sometimes lines in our own language, for he was very able in English poetry, to this effect: ‘None is wiser than him needeth, ere his departure, than to ponder ere the soul flits, what good, what evil it hath wrought, and how after death it will be judged.’
He also sang antiphons according to our ritual and his own, one of which is, ‘O glorious King, Lord of all power, who, triumphing this day, did ascend up above the heavens, leave us not orphans; but send down on us from the Father the Spirit of Truth which Thou hast promised. Hallelujah.’ And when he came to the words, ‘leave us not orphans,‘ he burst into tears, and continued weeping. But an hour after he rallied himself and began to repeat the antiphon he had begun. By turns we read, and by turns we wept — nay, we wept while we read. In such joy we passed the days of Lent, till the aforesaid day. He often repeated, ‘The Lord scourgeth every son whom He receiveth,’ and much more out of Scripture; as also this sentence from Saint Ambrose, ‘I have not lived so as to be ashamed to live among you, nor do I fear to die, for our God is gracious.’
During these days he laboured to compose two works, besides his giving us our lessons and singing psalms. He was engaged on translating the Gospel of Saint John into the vulgar tongue for the benefit of the Church, and had got as far as the words, ‘But what are these among so many’ (S. John vi. 9), and he was also making some notes out of the book of Bishop Isidore; for he said, ‘I will not have my pupils read what is untrue, nor labour on what is profitless after my death.’ On the Tuesday before the Ascension his breath became much affected, and his feet swelled, but he passed all that day cheerfully and continued his dictation, saying, ‘Be quick with your writing, for I will not hold out much longer.’ So he spent the night awake giving thanks, and when morning broke, that is Wednesday, he ordered us to write with all speed what he had begun.
And there was one of us who said to him, ‘Most dear master, there is still one chapter wanting. Will it trouble you if I ask a few questions?’ for the rest of us had gone to make the Rogation procession. He answered, ‘It is no trouble. Take your pen, and write fast.’ And when it came to the ninth hour he said to me, ‘There are some articles of value in my chest, as peppercorns, napkins and incense. Run quickly and bring the priests of the monastery to me, that I may distribute among them the gifts which God has bestowed on me.’ And when they were come he spoke to each of them in turn, and entreated them to pray and offer the Holy Sacrifice for his soul, which they all readily promised, but they were all weeping, for he said ‘You will see my face again no more in this life. It is time for me to return to Him who formed me out of nothing. The time of my dissolution is at hand. I desire to be dissolved, and to be with Christ.’ Now when even came on, the boy above mentioned said, ‘Dear master, there is yet one sentence not written.’ He answered, ‘Then write it quickly now.’ Soon after the boy said, ‘It is finished. The sentence is now written.’ He replied, ‘It was well said, it is finished. Raise my old head in your arms, that I may look once more at the happy, holy place, where I was wont to pray, that sitting up in my bed I may call on my Father.’ And thus on the pavement of his little cell, singing ‘Glory be to the Father, and to the Son, and to the Holy Ghost,’ he breathed his last, as he uttered the name of the Holy Ghost, and so departed to the heavenly kingdom. All who were present thought they had never seen any one die with so much devotion, and in so peaceful a state of mind.”
The monastic sanctuary towards which the dying look of Bede was turned still remains in part, if we may believe the best archaeologists, in the recently restored parish church of Jarrow, which has been carefully renovated in honour of England’s first great historian, every relic of the ancient building as old as Bede being carefully preserved. An old oak chair is still shown, which the saint is pretended to have used. Like all the other saints of the period, without exception, he was canonised by popular veneration, tacitly approved by the Church. Many pilgrims came to Jarrow to visit his tomb. His relics were stolen in the ninth century and carried to Durham, where they were placed with those of Saint Cuthbert. They were an object of veneration to the faithful up to the general profanation under Henry VIII who pulled down the shrine and buried them with those of all the other holy apostles and martyrs of Northumbria.
Towards the ninth century Bede received the appellation of the Venerable, which has ever since been attached to his name. As a specimen of the fables by which his biography was gradually obscured, we may cite the legends invented to account for the origin of this latter title. According to one, the Anglo-Saxon scholars were on a visit to Rome, and there saw a gate of iron on which was inscribed the letters P.P.P., S.S.S., R.R.R., F.F.F., which no one was able to interpret. While Bede was attentively considering the inscription, a Roman who was passing by said to him rudely, “What see you there, English ox?” to which Bede replied, “I see your confusion,” and he immediately explained the character thus: Pater Patriae Perditus, Sapientia Secum Sublata, Ruet Regnum Romae, Ferro Flamma Fame. The Romans were astonished at the acuteness of their English visitor, and decreed that the title of Venerable should be thenceforth given to him.

According to another story, Bede, having become blind in his old age, was walking abroad with one of his disciples for a guide, when they arrived at an open place where there was a large heap of stones, and Bede’s companion persuaded his master to preach to the people who, as he pretended, were assembled to hear him. Bede delivered a moving discourse, and when he uttered the concluding words, “per saecula saeculorum,” to the great admiration of his disciple, the stones immediately cried out “Amen, Venerable Bede!” There is also a third legend on this subject which informs us that soon after Bede’s death, one of his disciples was appointed to compose an epitaph in Latin leonines, and carve it on his monument, and he began thus: Hac sunt in fossa Bedus ossa,” intending to introduce the word sancti or presbyteri; but as neither of these words would suit the metre, he left it blank and fell asleep. On awaking he found that an angel had completed the line, and that it stood thus: Hac sunt in fossa Bedus Venerabilis ossa.
Also on this day according to the ROMAN MARTYROLOGY:

The birthday of St. John, pope and martyr, who was called to Ravenna by the Arian king of Italy, Theodoric, and after languishing a long time in prison for the orthodox faith, terminated his life.

At Dorostorum in Mysia, in the time of the emperor Alexander, the martyrdom of blessed Julius, a veteran soldier in retirement who was arrested by the officials and presented to the governor Maximus. Having in his presence execrated the idols and confessed the name of Christ with the utmost constancy, he was condemned to capital punishment.

At Sora, in the time of the emperor Aurelian and the proconsul Agathius, St. Restituta, virgin and martyr, who overcame in a combat for the faith the violence of the demons, the caresses of her family and the cruelty of the executioners. Being finally beheaded with other Christians, she obtained the honour of martyrdom.

In the territory of Arras, St. Ranulph, martyr.

At Orange in France, St. Eutropius, a bishop, illustrious for virtues and miracles.

And in other places, many other holy martyrs, confessors and virgins.

Thanks be to God.

27 MAY – ROGATION TUESDAY

Dom Prosper Gueranger:
Let us think for a moment of the countless sins that are being committed day and night. Let us sue for mercy. In the days of Noah, all flesh had corrupted its way (Genesis vi. 12), but men thought not of asking for mercy. The flood came and destroyed them all (Genesis vii. 11), says our Saviour. Had they prayed, had they begged God’s pardon, the hand of His justice would have been stayed, and the flood-gates of heaven would not have been opened. The day is to come when, not water, as heretofore, but fire is suddenly to be kindled by the Divine wrath, and is to burn the whole earth. It will burn even the foundations of the mountains (Deuteronomy xxxii. 22). It will devour sinners, who will be resting then, as they were in the days of Noah, in a false security. Persecuted by her enemies, decimated by the martyrdom of her children, afflicted by numerous apostasies from the faith, and deprived of every human aid, the Church will know that the terrible chastisement is at hand, for prayer will then be as rare as faith.
Let us therefore pray that thus the day of wrath may be put off, the Christian life regain something of its ancient vigour, and the end of the world not be in our times. There are even yet Catholics in every part of the world, but their number has visibly decreased. Heresy is now in possession of whole countries that were once faithful to the Church. In others, where heresy has not triumphed, religious indifference has left the majority of men with nothing of Catholicity but the name, seeing that they neglect even their most essential obligations without remorse. Among many of those who fulfil the precepts of the Church, truths are diminished (Psalms xi. 2). The old honesty of Faith fas been superseded by loose ideas and half-formed convictions. A man is popular in proportion to the concessions he makes in favour of principles condemned by the Church. The sentiments and actions of the saints, the conduct and teaching of the Church, are taxed with exaggeration, and decried as being unsuited to the period. The search after comforts has become a serious study. The thirst for earthly goods is a noble passion. Independence is an idol to which everything must be sacrificed. Submission is a humiliation which must be got rid of, or, where that cannot be, it must not be publicly avowed. Finally, there is sensualism, which, like an impure atmosphere, so impregnates every class of society, that one would suppose there was a league formed to abolish the Cross of Christ from the minds of men.
What miseries must not follow from this systematic setting aside the conditions imposed by God upon His creatures? If the Gospel be the word of Infinite Truth, how can men oppose it without drawing down upon themselves the severest chastisements? Would that these chastisements might work the salvation of them that have provoked them! Let us humble ourselves before the sovereign holiness of our God, and confess our guilt. The sins of men are increasing both in number and in enormity. The picture we have just drawn is sad enough. What would it not be, had we added such abominations as these, which we purposely excluded: downright impiety, corrupt doctrines which are being actively propagated throughout the world, dealings with Satan which threaten to degrade our age to the level of pagan times, the conspiracy organised against order, justice and religion by secret societies? Oh, let us unite our prayer with that of holy Church, and say to our God: “From your wrath, deliver us, Lord!”
The Rogation Days were instituted for another end besides this of averting the Divine anger. We must beg our Heavenly Father to bless the fruits of the earth. We must beseech Him, with all the earnestness of public prayer, to give us our daily bread. “The eyes of all,” says the Psalmist, “hope in you, Lord, and you give them food in due season. You open your hand, and fill with blessing every living creature” (Psalms cxliv. 15, 16) In accordance with the consoling doctrine conveyed by these words, the Church prays to God that He would, this year, give to all living creatures on earth the food they stand in need of. She acknowledges that we are not worthy of the favour, for we are sinners: let us unite with her in this humble confession. But, at the same time, let us join her in beseeching our Lord to make mercy triumph over justice. How easily could He not frustrate the self-conceited hopes, and the clever systems of men! They own that all depends on the weather, and on whom does that depend? They cannot do without God! True, they seldom speak of Him, and He permits Himself to be forgotten by them: but “He neither sleeps nor slumbers, that hears Israel” (Psalms cxx. 4) He has but to withhold His blessing, and all their progress in agricultural science by which they boast to have made famine an impossibility, is of no effect. Some unknown disease comes upon a vegetable. it causes distress among the people, and endangers the social order of a world that has secularised itself from the Christian Law, and would at once perish, but for the mercy of the God it affects to ignore.
If, then, our Heavenly Father deigns this year to bless the fruits of the earth, we may say in all truth that He gives food to them that forget and blaspheme Him, as well as to them that make Him the great object of their thoughts and service. Men of no religion will profit of the blessing, but they will not acknowledge it to be His. They will proclaim louder than ever that nature’s laws are now so well regulated by modern science, that she cannot help going on well! God will be silent, and feed the men that thus insult Him. But why does He not speak? Why does He not make His wrath be felt? Because His Church has prayed, because He has found the ten just men (Genesis xviii. 32), that is the few for whose sake He mercifully consents to spare the world. He therefore permits the learned economists, whom He could so easily stultify to go on talking and writing. Thanks to this His patience, some of them will grow tired of their impious absurdity. An unexpected circumstance will open their eyes to the truth, and they will, one day, join us both in faith and prayer. Others will go deeper and deeper into blasphemy. They will go on to the last, defying God’s justice, and fulfilling in themselves that terrible saying of holy Scripture: “The Lord has made all things for Himself; the wicked also for the evil day” (Proverbs xvi. 4).
As to us, who glory in the simplicity of our faith, who acknowledge that we have all from God and nothing from ourselves, who confess that we are sinners and undeserving of His gifts — we will ask Him during these three days to give us the food we require. We will say to Him with holy Church: “That you vouchsafe to give and preserve the fruits of the earth: We beseech you, hear us!” May He have pity on us in our necessities!



Monday, 26 May 2025

26 MAY – SAINT ELEUTHERIUS (Pope and Martyr)


Eleutherius was born at Nicopolis in Greece. He was a deacon of Pope Anicetus, and during the reign of the emperor Commodus was chosen to govern the Church. At the beginning of his pontificate he received letters from Lucius, king of the Britons, begging him to receive himself and his subjects among the Christians. Eleutherius sent into Britain Fugatius and Damian, two learned and holy men, through whose ministry the king and his people might receive the Faith. It was also during this pontificate that Irenaeus, a disciple of Polycarp, went to Rome and was kindly received by Eleutherius. The Church of God was then enjoying great peace and calm and the Faith made progress throughout the whole world, but nowhere more than at Rome. Eleutherius governed the Church 15 years and 23 days. He thrice ordinations in December at which he made 12 priests, 8 deacons and 15 bishops. He was buried in the Vatican near the body of Saint Peter.

Dom Prosper Guéranger:
This twenty-sixth of May is also honoured by the memory of one of those early Pontiffs who, like Urban, were the foundations of the Church in the Age of Persecution. Eleutherius ascended the Papal throne in the very midst of the storm that was raised by Marcus Aurelius and Commodus. It was he that received the embassy that was sent to Rome by the Martyrs of Lyons and, at the head of them that were thus sent was the great Saint Irenaeus. This illustrious Church which was then so rich in martyrdom would offer its palms to Christian Rome in which, to use Saint Irenaeus’ own expression, it recognised “the highest sovereignty.” Peace, however, was soon restored to the Church and the remainder of Eleutherius’ pontificate was undisturbed. In the enjoyment of this peace, and with his name which signifies a freeman, this Pontiff is an image of our Risen Jesus, who, as the Psalmist says of him, is free among the dead (Psalm lxxxvii. 6).
The Church honours Saint Eleutherius as a martyr, as she does the other Popes who lived before Constantine and of whom almost all shed their blood in the Persecutions of the first three centuries. Sharing, as they did, in all the sufferings of the Church, governing it amid perils of every description, and seldom or never knowing what peace was — these three and thirty Pontiffs have every right to be considered as martyrs.
*****
Your name, O Eleutherius, is the name of every Christian that has risen with Christ. The Pasch has delivered us all, emancipated all, made us all freemen. Pray for us that we may ever preserve that glorious liberty of the children of God of which the Apostle speaks (Romans viii. 21). By it were we freed from the chains of sin which consigned us to death, from the slavery of Satan who would fain have robbed us of our Last End, and from the tyranny of the world which was deceiving us by its false maxims. The New Life given to us by our Pasch is one that is all of Heaven, where our Jesus is awaiting us in glory. To lose it would be to return to slavery.
Holy Pontiff, pray for us that when the Pasch of next year comes, it may find us in that happy liberty which is the fruit of our having been redeemed by Christ (Galatians iv. 31). There is another kind of liberty of which the world boasts and for the acquiring which it sets men at variance with men. It consists in avoiding as a crime, all subjection and dependence, and in recognising no authority except the one appointed by our own elections which we can remove as soon as we please. Deliver us, O holy Pontiff, from this false liberty which is so opposed to the Christian spirit of obedience, and is simply the triumph of human pride. In its frenzy it sheds torrents of blood, and with its pompous cant of what it calls the Rights of Man) it substitutes egoism for duty. It acknowledges no such thing as Truth, for it maintains that error has its sacred rights. It acknowledges no such thing as Good, for it has given up all pretension to preventing Evil. It puts God aside, for it refuses to recognise Him in those who govern. It puts upon man the yoke of brute force. It tyrannises over him by what it calls a “Majority” and it answers every complaint that he may make against injustice by the jargon of “Accomplished Facts.” No, this is not the liberty into which we are called by Christ, our Deliverer. We are free, as Saint Peter says, and yet make not liberty a cloak for malice (1 Peter ii. 16).
O holy Pontiff, show yourself still a Father to the world. During your peaceful reign your throne was near to that of the Caesars who governed the Seven Hilled City. They were the rulers of the world and yet your name was revered in every part of their Empire. While the material power held the sword suspended over your head, the faithful of various distant lands were flocking to Rome, there to venerate the tomb of Peter and pay homage to you his Successor. When Lucius sent ambassadors from his island, they turned not their steps to the emperor’s palace, but to your humble dwelling. They came to tell you that a people was called by divine grace to receive the Good Tidings and become a portion of the Christian family. The destinies of this people, which you were the first to evangelise, were to be great in the Church. The island of the Britains is a daughter of the Roman Church, and the attempts she is now making to disown her origin are useless. Have pity on her, O you that were her first Apostle! Bless the efforts which are being everywhere made to bring her back to unity with the Church. Remember the faith of Lucius and his people and show your paternal solicitude for a country which you led to the Faith.

26 MAY – SAINT PHILIP NERI (Confessor)


Philip Neri was born at Florence of pious and respectable parents. From his very childhood he gave evident promise of future sanctity. While yet a young man, he gave up an ample fortune which he inherited from an uncle, and went to Rome where he studied theology and philosophy, and devoted himself wholly to the service of Jesus. Such was his abstemiousness, that he frequently passed three days without eating anything. He spent much time in watching and prayer. He frequently made the visit of the Seven Churches of the City, and was in the habit of spending the night in the Cemetery of Calixtus in the contemplation of heavenly things. Being ordained priest out of obedience he devoted himself without reserve to the saving souls and, even to the last day of his life, he was assiduous in bearing confessions. He was the spiritual father of a countless number of souls, and in order to nourish them with the daily food of God’s word, with the frequency of the Sacraments, with application to prayer, and with other pious exercises, he instituted the Congregation of the Oratory.

He was ever languishing with the love of God with which he was wounded. Such was the ardour that glowed within him that, not being able to keep his heart within its place, his breast was miraculously enlarged by the breaking and expansion of two of his ribs. Sometimes, when celebrating Mass or in fervent prayer, he was seen to be raised up in the air and encircled with a bright light. He looked after the needy and the poor with an all-providing charity. He was once rewarded by a visit from an Angel who appeared to him in a beggar’s garb, and Philip gave him an alms. On another occasion, when carrying loaves to the poor, during the night he fell into a deep hole but was drawn forth by an Angel without having sustained any injury. So humble was he that he had an abiding dread of everything that savoured of honour, and he was most resolute in refusing every ecclesiastical dignity, though the highest offices were more than once offered to him.

He possessed the gift of prophecy, and could miraculously read the inmost thoughts of others’ souls. Throughout his whole life he preserved his chastity unsullied. He had also a supernatural power of distinguishing those who were chaste from those who were not so. He sometimes appeared to persons who were at a distance and assisted them in moments of danger. He restored to health many that were sick and at death’s door. He also restored a dead man to life. He was frequently favoured with apparitions of heavenly Spirits and of the Blessed Mother of God. He saw the souls of several persons ascending amid great brightness into Heaven. At length, being in his eightieth year, he slept in the Lord in 1595 on the eighth of the Calends of June (May 25th), the feast of Corpus Christi, after having said Mass with extraordinary spiritual joy, and at the very hour which he had foretold, which was shortly after midnight. The miracles with which he had been honoured being authentically proved, he was canonised by Pope Gregory XV.

Dom Prosper Guéranger:
As we have already said, joy is the leading feature of the Paschal Season — a supernatural joy which springs from our delight at seeing the glorious triumph of our Emmanuel, and from the happiness we feel at our own being delivered from the bonds of death. This interior joy was the characteristic of the Saint whom we honour today. His heart was ever full of a jubilant enthusiasm for what regards God so that we could truly apply to him those words of Scripture: “A secure mind is like a continual feast” (Proverbs xv. 15). One of his latest disciples, the illustrious Father Faber, tells us in his beautiful treatise, Growth in Holiness, that cheerfulness is one of the chief means for advancing in Christian perfection. We will, therefore, welcome with gladness and veneration the benevolent and light-hearted Philip Neri, the Apostle of Rome, and one of the greatest Saints produced by the Church in the sixteenth century.
Love of God — but a love of the most ardent kind and one that communicated itself to all that came near him — was our Saint’s characteristic virtue. All the Saints loved God, for the love of God is the first and greatest of the Commandments: but Philip’s whole life was, in a special manner, the fulfilment of this divine precept. His entire existence seemed to be but one long transport of love for His Creator and, had it not been for a miracle of God’s power and goodness, this burning love would have soon put an end to his mortal career. He was in his twenty-ninth year when one day — it was within the Whitsun Octave — he was seized with such a vehemence of divine charity that two of his ribs broke, thus making room for the action of the heart to respond freely to the intensity of the soul’s love. The fracture was never made good. It caused a protrusion which was distinctly observable and, owing to this miraculous enlargement of the region of the heart, Philip was enabled to live fifty years more, during which time he loved his God with a fervour and strength which would do honour to one already in Heaven.
This Seraph in human flesh was a living answer to the insults heaped upon the Catholic Church by the so-called Reformation. Luther and Calvin had called this holy Church the harlot of Babylon, and yet she had at that very time such children as Teresa of Spain, and Philip Neri of Rome to offer to the admiration of mankind. But Protestantism cared little or nothing for piety or charity. Its great object was the throwing off the yoke of restraint. Under pretence of Religious Liberty, it persecuted them that adhered to the True Faith. It forced itself by violence where it could not enter by seduction. But as for leading men to love their God, this was what it never aimed at or thought of. The result was that, wherever it imposed its errors, devotedness was at an end — we mean that devotedness which leads man to make sacrifices for God or for his neighbour. A very long period of time elapsed after the Reformation before Protestantism ever gave a thought to the infidels who abounded in various parts of the globe: and if, later on, it organised what it calls its Missions, it chose a strange set of men to be the apostles of its Bible Societies. It has made a recent discovery — it has found out that the Catholic Church is prolific in Orders and Congregations devoted to works of charity. The discovery has excited it to emulation and, among its other imitations, it can now boast of having Protestant Sisters of Charity. To a certain point, success may encourage it to persevere in these tardy efforts, but anything like the devotedness of Catholic institutions is an impossibility for Protestantism, were it only for this reason — that its principles are opposed to the Evangelical Counsels which are the great sources of the spirit of sacrifice, and are prompted by a motive of the love of God.
Glory, then, to Philip Neri, one of the worthiest representatives of charity in the sixteenth century! It was owing to his zeal, that Rome and Christendom at large were replenished with a new life by the frequentation of the Sacraments and by the exercises of Catholic piety. His word, his very look, used to excite people to devotion. His memory is still held in deep veneration, especially in Rome, where his feast is kept with the greatest solemnity on this twenty-sixth day of May. He shares with Saints Peter and Paul the honour of being Patron of the Holy City. His Feast is there kept as a day of obligation. The Pope goes, with great solemnity, to the Church of Saint Mary in Vallicella and pays the debt of gratitude which the Holy See owes to the Saint who accomplished such great things for the glory of our Holy Mother the Church. Philip had the gift of miracles and, though seeking to be forgotten and despised, he was continually surrounded by people who besought him to pray for them, either in their temporal or spiritual concerns.
Death itself was obedient to his command, as in the case of the young prince Paul Massimo. The young Prince, when breathing his last, desired that Philip should be sent for in order that he might assist him to die happily. The Saint was saying Mass at the time. As soon as the Holy Sacrifice was over, he repaired to the palace but he was too late. He found the father, sister and the whole family in tears.
The young Prince had died after an illness of 65 days, which he had borne with most edifying patience. Philip fell upon his knees and after a fervent prayer he put his hand on the head of the corpse and called the Prince by his name. Thus awakened from the sleep of death, Paul opened his eyes and looking at Philip, said to him: “My Father!” He then added these words: “I only wished to go to Confession.” The assistants left the room and Philip remained alone with the Prince. After a few moments the family were called back and, in their presence, Paul began to speak to Philip regarding his mother and sister who had been taken from him by death and whom he loved with the tenderest affection. During the conversation, the Prince’s face regained all it had lost by sickness. His animation was that of one in perfect health. The Saint then asked him if he would wish to die again? “Oh yes" answered the Prince, “most willingly, for I should then see my mother and sister in Heaven.” “Take then,” said Philip, “take your departure for Heaven and pray to the Lord for me.” At these words, the young Prince expired once more and entered into the joys of eternal life, leaving his family to mourn his departure and venerate a Saint such as Philip.
He was almost continually visited by our Lord with raptures and ecstasies. He was gifted with the spirit of prophecy and could read the secrets of the conscience. His virtues were such as to draw souls to him by an irresistible charm. The youth of Rome, rich and poor, used to flock to him. Some he warned against danger, others he saved after they had fallen. The poor and sick were the object of his unceasing care. He seemed to be everywhere in the city by his works of zeal, which gave an impulse to piety that has never been forgotten. Philip was convinced that one of the principal means for maintaining the Christian spirit is the preaching the word of God: hence he was most anxious to provide the Faithful with apostolic men who would draw them to God by good and solid preaching. He established, under the name of The Oratory, an institution which still exists, and whose object is to encourage Christian piety among the people. By founding it, Philip aimed at securing the services, zeal and talent of priests who are not called to the religious life but who, by uniting their labours together, would produce great good to the souls of men.
Thus did he afford to priests, whose vocation does not lead them to the religious state, the great advantages of a common rule and mutual good example, which are such powerful aids both in the service of God, and in the exercise of pastoral duties. But the holy apostle was a man of too much faith not to have an esteem of the religious life as a state of perfection. He never lost an opportunity of encouraging a vocation to that holy state. The religious Orders were indebted to him for so many members, that his intimate friend and admirer, Saint Ignatius of Loyola, used playfully to compare him to a bell which calls others to Church yet never goes in itself! The awful crisis of the sixteenth century through which the Christian world had to pass, and which robbed the Catholic Church of so many provinces, was a source of keenest grief to Philip during the whole of his life. His heart bled at seeing so many thousand souls fall into the abyss of error and heresy. He took the deepest interest in the efforts that were made to reclaim those that had been led astray by the pretended Reformation. He kept a watchful eye on the tactics with which Protestantism sought to maintain its ground. The “Centuries of Magdeburg,” for example, suggested to his zeal a counterbalance of truth. The “Centuries” was a series of historical essays by which the Reformers sought to prove that the Roman Church had changed the ancient Faith and introduced superstitious practices in the place of those that were used in the early ages of Christianity.
A work like this, with its falsified quotations, its misrepresentation and, not infrequently its invention of facts was destined to do great injury, and Philip resolved to meet it by a work of profound erudition — a true history compiled from authentic sources. One of the fathers of his Oratory, Caesar Baronius, was just the man for such an undertaking, and Philip ordered him to take the field against the enemy. The Ecclesiastical Annals were the fruit of this happy thought, and Baronius himself, at the beginning of his Eighth Book, acknowledges that Philip was the originator of the work. It is easy for us, with the means which science now puts into our hands, to detect certain imperfections in the Annals. At the same time, it is acknowledged on all sides that they form by far the truest and finest History of the Church of the first twelve hundred years, which is as far as the learned Cardinal went. Heresy felt the injury it must needs sustain by such a History. The sickly and untrustworthy erudition of the Centuriators could not stand before an honest statement of facts, and we may safely assert that the progress of Protestantism was checked by the Annals of Baronius which showed that the Church was then, as she had ever been, the pillar and ground of the truth (1 Timothy iii. 15). Philip’s sanctity and Baronius’ learning secured the victory. Numerous conversions soon followed, consoling the Church for the losses she had sustained. And if, in these our own days, there are so many returning to the ancient Faith, it is but fair to attribute the movement, in part at least, to the success of the historical method begun by the Annals.
*****
Your whole life, O Philip, was one long act of love of Jesus. But it was also one untiring effort to make others know and love Him and thus secure the End for which they were created. You were the indefatigable Apostle of Rome for forty years, and no one could approach you without receiving something of the divine ardour that filled your heart. We too would fain receive of your fullness of devotion and therefore we pray you to teach us how to love our Risen Jesus. It is not enough that we adore Him and rejoice in His triumph. We must love Him, for He has permitted us to celebrate the various Mysteries of His life on Earth with a view to our seeing more and more clearly how deserving He is of our warmest love. It is love that will lead us to the full appreciation of His Resurrection — that bright Mystery which shows us all the riches of the Sacred Heart. The New Life, which he put on by rising from the tomb, teaches us, more eloquently than ever, how tenderly He loves us and how earnestly He importunes us to love Him in return. Pray for us, O Philip, that our heart and our flesh may rejoice in the Living God! (Psalm lxxxiii. 2). Now that we have relished the mystery of the Pasch, lead us to that of the Ascension. Prepare our souls to receive the Holy Spirit at Pentecost, and when the august mystery of the Eucharist beams on us with all its loveliness in the approaching Festival — the very day that ushered you into the unveiled vision of your Jesus — intercede for us that we may receive and relish that Living Bread which gives life to the world! (John vi. 33).
The sanctity that shone in you, O Philip, was marked by the impetuosity of your soul’s longing after her God, and all they that held intercourse with you quickly imbibed your spirit — which, in truth, is the only one that contents our Redeemer’s Heart. You had the talent of winning souls and leading them to perfection by the path of confidence and generosity. In this great work, your method consisted in having none, thus imitating the Apostles and ancient Fathers and trusting to the power of God’s own word. It was by you that the frequenting the Sacraments was restored — that surest indication of the Christian spirit. Pray for the faithful of our times, and come to the assistance of so many souls that are anxiously pursuing systems of spirituality which have been coined by the hands of men, and which but too frequently retard or even impede the intimate union of the creature with His Creator.
Your love of the Church, O Philip, was most fervent: there can be no true sanctity without it. Though your contemplation was of the sublimest kind, yet did it not make you lose sight of the cruel trials which this holy Spouse of Christ had to endure in those sad times. The successful efforts of heresy stimulated your zeal. Get us that keen sympathy for our holy Faith which will make us take an interest in all that concerns its progress. It is not enough for us that we save our own souls. We must, moreover, ardently desire and do our utmost to obtain the advancement of God’s kingdom on Earth, the extirpation of heresy, and the exaltation of our holy Mother the Church. If these are not our dispositions, how can we call ourselves children of God? May your example urge us to take to heart the sacred cause of our common Mother. Pray, too, for the Church Militant of which you were one of the bravest soldiers. Shield with your protection that Rome which loves you so devoutly because of the services which she received at your hands. You led her children to holiness during your mortal career. Bless her and defend her now that you are in Heaven.

26 MAY – ROGATION MONDAY

Dom Prosper Gueranger:
It seems strange that there should be anything like mourning during Paschal Time, and yet these three days are days of penance. A moment’s reflection, however, will show us that the institution of the Rogation Days is a most appropriate one. True, our Saviour told us before His Passion that the children of the Bridegroom should not fast while the Bridegroom is with them (Luke v. 34), but is not sadness in keeping with these the last hours of Jesus’ presence on Earth? Were not His Mother and Disciples oppressed with grief at the thought of their having so soon to lose Him whose company had been to them a foretaste of Heaven?
Let us see how the Liturgical Year came to have inserted in its Calendar these three days during which Holy Church, though radiant with the joy of Easter, seems to go back to her Lenten observances. The Holy Ghost, who guides her in all things, willed that this completion of her Paschal Liturgy should owe its origin to a devotion peculiar to one of the most illustrious and venerable Churches of southern Gaul: it was the Church of Vienne. The second half of the fifth century had but just commenced when the country round Vienne, which had been recently conquered by the Burgundians, was visited with calamities of every kind. The people were struck with fear at these indications of God’s anger. Saint Mamertus, who, at the time, was Bishop of Vienne, prescribed three days public expiation during which the faithful were to devote themselves to penance, and walk in procession chanting appropriate Psalms. The three days preceding the Ascension were the ones chosen. Unknown to himself, the holy Bishop was thus instituting a practice which was afterwards to form part of the Liturgy of the universal Church.
The Churches of Gaul, as might naturally be expected, were the first to adopt the devotion. Saint Alcimus Avitus, who was one of the earliest successors of Saint Mamertus in the See of Vienne, informs us that the custom of keeping the Rogation Days was at that time firmly established in his Diocese. Saint Caesarius of Aries, who lived in the early part of the sixth century, speaks of their being observed in countries afar off, by which he meant, at the very least, to designate all that portion of Gaul which was under the Visigoths. That the whole of Gaul soon adopted the custom is evident from the Canons drawn up at the first Council of Orleans held in 511, and which represented all the Provinces that were in allegiance to Clovis. The regulations, made by the Council regarding the Rogations, give us a great idea of the importance attached to their observance. Not only abstinence from flesh-meat, but even fasting, is made of obligation. Masters are also required to dispense their servants from work, in order that they may assist at the long functions which fill up almost the whole of these three days. In 567 the Council of Tours, likewise, imposed the precept of fasting during the Rogation Days, and as to the obligation of resting from servile work, we find it recognised in the Capitularia of Charlemagne and Charles the Bald.
The main part of the Rogation rite originally consisted, (at least in Gaul), in singing canticles of supplication while passing from place to place — and hence the word procession. We learn from Saint Caesarius of Aries that each day’s procession lasted six hours, and that when the clergy became tired, the women took up the chanting. The faithful of those days had not made the discovery, which was reserved for modern times, that one requisite for religious processions is that they be as short as possible.
The procession for the Rogation Days was preceded by the faithful receiving the ashes upon their heads, as now at the beginning of Lent. They were then sprinkled with holy water, and the procession began. It was made up of the clergy and people of several of the smaller parishes, who were headed by the Cross of the principal Church, which conducted the whole ceremony. All walked bare-foot, singing the Litany, Psalms and Antiphons. They entered the churches that lay on their route, and sang an Antiphon or Responsory appropriate to each. Such was the original ceremony of the Rogation Days, and it was thus observed for a very long period. The Monk of St. Gall’s, who has left us so many interesting details regarding the life of Charlemagne, tells us that this holy Emperor used to join the processions of these three days, and walk barefooted from his palace to the Stational Church. We find Saint Elizabeth of Hungary, in the fourteenth century, setting the like example: during the Rogation Days she used to mingle with the poorest women of the place, and walked bare-footed, wearing a dress of coarse stuff. Saint Charles Borromeo, who restored in his Diocese of Milan so many ancient practices of piety, was sure not to be indifferent about the Rogation Days. He spared neither word nor example to re-animate this salutary devotion among his people. He ordered fasting to be observed during these three days. He fasted himself on bread and water. The procession, in which all the clergy of the city were obliged to join, and which began after the sprinkling of ashes, started from the Cathedral at an early hour in the morning, and was not over till three or four o’clock in the afternoon. Thirteen churches were visited on the Monday, nine on the Tuesday, and eleven on the Wednesday. The saintly Archbishop celebrated Mass and preached in one of these churches.
If we compare the indifference shown by the Catholics of the present age for the Rogation Days, with the devotion with which our ancestors kept them, we cannot but acknowledge that there is a great falling off in faith and piety. Knowing, as we do, the importance attached to these processions by the Church, we cannot help wondering how it is that there are so few among the faithful who assist at them. Our surprise increases when we find persons preferring their own private devotions to these public prayers of the Church, which to say nothing of the result of good example, merit far greater graces than any exercises of our own fancying.
The whole Western Church soon adopted the Rogation Days. They were introduced into England at an early period. So, likewise, into Spain and Germany. Rome herself sanctioned them by her own observing them. This she did in the eighth century during the pontificate of Saint Leo III. She gave them the name of the Lesser Litanies, in contradistinction to the Procession of the 25th of April, which she calls the Greater Litanies. With regard to the fast which the churches of Gaul observed during the Rogation Days, Rome did not adopt that part of the institution. Fasting seemed to her to throw a gloom over the joyous forty days which our Risen Jesus grants to His disciples. She therefore enjoined only abstinence from flesh-meat during the Rogation Days. The Church of Milan, which, as we have just seen, so strictly observes the Rogations, keeps them on the Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday after the Sunday within the Octave of the Ascension, that is to say, after the forty days devoted to the celebration of the Resurrection.
If, then, we would have a correct idea of the Rogation Days, we must consider them as Rome does, that is, as a holy institution which, without interrupting our Paschal joy, tempers it. The purple vestments used during the procession and Mass do not signify that our Jesus has fled from us (Canticles viii. 14), but that the time for His departure is approaching. By prescribing abstinence for these three days, the Church would express how much she will feel the loss of her Spouse who is so soon to be taken from her. In England, as in many other countries, abstinence is no longer of obligation for the Rogation Days. This should be an additional motive to induce the faithful to assist at the Processions and Litanies, and, by their fervently uniting in the prayers of the Church, to make some compensation for the abolition of the law of abstinence. We need so much penance, and we take so little! If we are truly in earnest, we will be most fervent in doing the little that is left us to do.
The object of the Rogation Days is to appease the anger of God, and avert the chastisements which the sins of the world so justly deserve. Moreover, to draw down the divine blessing on the fruits of the earth. The Litany of the Saints is sung during the Procession, which is followed by a special Mass said in the Stational Church, or if there be no Station appointed, in the church whence the Procession first started. The Litany of the Saints is one of the most efficacious of prayers. The Church makes use of it on all solemn occasions as a means for rendering God propitious through the intercession of the whole court of heaven. They who are prevented from assisting at the Procession should recite the Litany in union with holy Church: they will thus share in the graces attached to the Rogation Days. They will be joining in the supplications now being made throughout the entire world. They will be proving themselves to be Catholics.
Epistle – James v. 16‒20
Dearly beloved, confess your sins one to another, and pray one for another, that you may be saved. For the continual prayer of a just man avails much. Elias was a man passible like us: and with prayer he prayed that it might not rain upon the earth, and it rained not for three years and six months. And he prayed again, and the heaven gave rain, and the earth brought forth her fruit. My brethren, if any of you err from the truth, and one convert him, he must know that he who caused a sinner to be converted from the error of his way, will save his soul from death, and will cover a multitude of sins.
Thanks be to God.

Dom Prosper Gueranger:
Again it is the Apostle Saint James the Less who speaks to us in today’s Epistle, and could any words be more appropriate? One of the motives for the institution of the Rogation Days is the obtaining from God the blessing of weather favourable to the fruits of the earth, and Saint James here adduces the example of Elias to show us that prayer can stay or bring down the rain of heaven. Let us imitate the faith of this Prophet and beg of our heavenly Father to give and preserve what we require for our nourishment. Another object of the Rogations is the obtaining the forgiveness of sin. If we pray with fervour for our brethren who are gone astray, we will obtain for them the graces they stand in need of. We will perhaps never know, during this life, them whom our prayer, united with the prayer of the Church, will have converted from the error of their way, but the Apostle assures us that our charity will receive a rich reward, the mercy of God upon ourselves.
Gospel – Luke xi. 5‒13
At that time Jesus said to His disciples: “Which of you will have a friend, and will go to him at midnight, and will say to him: ‘Friend, lend me three loaves, because a friend of mine has come off his journey to me, and I have not what to set before him:’ and he from within should answer and say: ‘Trouble me not, the door is now shut, and my children are with me in bed. I cannot rise and give you.’ Yet if he will continue knocking, I say to you, although he will not rise and give him, because he is his friend, yet because of his importunity he will rise and give him as many as he needs. And I say to you: Ask, and it will be given to you. Seek, and you will find. Knock, and it will be opened to you. For every one that asks, receives; and he that seeks, finds; and to him that knocks, it will be opened. And which of you, if he ask his father bread, will he give him a stone? Or a fish, will he for a fish give him a serpent? Or if he ask an egg, will he reach him a scorpion? If you then being evil, know how to give good gifts to your children, how much more will your Father from heaven give the good Spirit to them that ask Him?”
Praise be to you, O Christ.

Dom Prosper Gueranger:
Could anything show us the all-powerfulness of prayer more clearly than do these words of our Gospel? By thus putting them before us, holy Church shows us the importance of the Rogation Days, since it is during them that she shows us the efficacy of supplication, which triumphs over the refusal of God Himself. The reader who has followed us thus far in our work must have observed how the passages of Holy Writ selected by the Liturgy form a continued series of instruction appropriate to each day. During these three days we are labouring to appease the anger of heaven. Could there be a more fitting occasion for our being told that God cannot resist persevering prayer? The Litanies we have been chanting in Procession are a model of this holy obstinacy or, as our Gospel terms it, this importunity of prayer. How often did we not repeat the same words! Lord, have mercy on us! Deliver us, Lord! We beseech you, hear us! The divine Paschal Lamb who is about to be offered on our altar will mediate for us. A few moments hence and He will unite and join His ever efficacious intercession with our poor prayers. With such a pledge as this we will leave the holy place feeling sure that these prayers have not been made in vain. Let us, therefore, make a resolution to keep aloof no longer from the holy practices of the Church. Let us always prefer to pray with her, than to pray by ourselves. She is the Spouse of Jesus, she is our common Mother, and she always wishes us to take part with her in the prayers she offers up. Besides, is it not for us that she makes these prayers?

Sunday, 25 May 2025

25 MAY – SAINT GREGORY VII (Pope and Confessor)


Pope Gregory VII, whose baptismal name was Hildebrand, was born at Soana in Tuscany in about 1020. He excelled in learning, sanctity and every virtue, and rendered extraordinary service to the whole Church of God. It is related of him that when he was a little boy he happened to be at play in a carpenters shop when, gathering together the waste pieces of wood, he arranged them so as that they formed these words of Davids prophecy, though the boy knew not his alphabet: “He will rule from sea to sea.” It was God who guided the childs hand, and would thus signify that at some future time Gregory was to exercise an authority that would extend over the whole world. He afterwards went to Rome and was educated under the protection of Saint Peter. He was intensely grieved at finding the liberty of the Church crushed by lay interference and at beholding the depraved lives of the clergy. He, therefore, while still young, retired to the monastery of Cluny where strict monastic discipline was then in full vigour under the Rule of Holy Father Benedict. He there received the habit. So fervent was he in the service of the Divine Majesty that the holy religious of that Monastery chose him as their Prior.

But divine Providence having for the general good destined him to a higher work, Hildebrand was taken from Cluny, and was first made Abbot of the monastery of Saint Pauls Outside the Walls (Rome) and, afterwards, was created Cardinal of the Roman Church. He was entrusted with offices and missions of the highest importance under Popes Leo IX, Victor II, Stephen IX, Nicholas II and Alexander II. Saint Peter Damian used to call him the most holy and upright counsellor. Having been sent into France, as Legate a latere by Pope Victor II, by a miracle he compelled the Archbishop of Lyons to own that he had been guilty of simony. He also obliged Berenarius to repeat, at a Council held at Tours, his abjuration of heresy. The schism of Cadolaus was also repressed by his energetic measures.

At the death of Alexander II, in spite of his own repugnance and to his great sorrow, Hildebrand was chosen as Sovereign Pontiff by the unanimous votes, on the tenth of the Calends of May in 1073. He shone as the sun in the House of God for, being mighty in work and word, he applied himself to the renovation of ecclesiastical discipline, to the propagation of the faith, to the restoration of the Churchs liberty, and to the extirpation of false doctrines and scandals — but all this with so much zeal that it may truly be said that no Pontiff since the time of the Apostles ever laboured or suffered more for Gods Church, or fought more strenuously for that same Churchs liberty. He drove simony out of several provinces. He, like a dauntless soldier, bravely withstood the impious designs of the Emperor Henry, and feared not to set himself as a wall for the defence of the house of Israel. And when that same Henry had plunged himself into the abyss of crime, Gregory deprived him of communion with the faithful, and of his kingdom, and absolved his subjects from their oath of allegiance to him.

At times, when he was saying Mass, several holy persons saw a dove come down from Heaven, rest on his right shoulder and cover his head with its wings. This signified that Gregory, in governing the Church, was guided by the inspirations of the Holy Ghost and not by the suggestions of human prudence. When Rome was closely besieged by Henrys army, the Pontiff, by the sign of the Cross, quenched a conflagration that had been raised by the besiegers. When, afterwards, he was delivered from his enemy by the Norman chieftain, Robert Guiscard, Gregory repaired to Monte Cassino and thence to Salerno, that he might dedicate the Church of Saint Matthew the Apostle. After preaching a sermon to the people of that town, he fell ill, for he was worn out by care. He had the presentiment that this would be his last sickness. The last words of the dying Pontiff were these: “I have loved justice, and hated iniquity: for which cause, I die in exile.” Innumerable were the trials he courageously went through. He held several Synods in the city, and enacted regulations full of wisdom. He was, in all truth, a saintly man, an avenger of crime, and a most vigorous defender of the Church. After a Pontificate of 12 years, he left this Earth for Heaven in 1085. Many miracles were wrought by him and through his merit, both before and after his death. His holy remains were buried with all due honour in the Cathedral Church of Salerno.

Dom Prosper Guéranger:
Our Easter Calendar has already given us the two great Popes, Leo the Great and Pius V. It bids us, today, pay honour to the glorious memory of Gregory VII. These three names represent the action of the Papacy dating from the period of the Persecutions. The mission divinely put upon the successors of Saint Peter is this: the maintaining intact the truths of Faith, and the defending the liberty of the Church. Saint Leo courageously and eloquently asserted the ancient Faith which was called in question by the heretics of those days. Saint Pius V stemmed the torrent of the so-called Reformation and delivered Christendom from the yoke of Mahometanism. Saint Gregory VII came between these two and saved society from the greatest danger it had so far incurred, and restored the purity of Christian morals by restoring the liberty of the Church.
The end of the tenth, and the commencement of the eleventh, century was a period that brought upon the Church of Christ one of the severest trials she has ever endured. The two great scourges of Persecution and Heresy had subsided. They were followed by that of Barbarism. The impulse given to civilisation by Charlemagne was checked early in the ninth century. The Barbarian element had been but suppressed, and broke out again with renewed violence. Faith was still vigorous among the people, but of itself it could not triumph over the depravity of morals. The feudal system had produced anarchy throughout the whole of Europe. Anarchy created social disorder, and this in its turn occasioned the triumph of might and licentiousness over right. Kings and princes were no longer kept in check by the power of the Church for, Rome herself being a prey to factions, unworthy or unfit men were but too frequently raised to the Papal throne.
The eleventh century came. Its years were rapidly advancing and there seemed no remedy for the disorders it had inherited. Bishoprics had fallen a prey to the secular power which set them up for sale and the first requisite for a candidate to a prelacy was that he should be a vassal subservient to the ruler of the nation, ready to supply him with means for prosecuting war. The bishops being thus for the most part simoniacal, as Saint Peter Damian tells us they were, what could be expected from the inferior clergy, but scandals? The climax of these miseries was that ignorance increased with each generation and threatened to obliterate the very notion of duty. There was an end to both Church and society, had it not been for the promise of Christ that He would never abandon His own work.
In order to remedy these evils, in order to dispel all this mist of ignorance, Rome was to be raised from her state of degradation. She needed a holy and energetic Pontiff whose consciousness of having God on his side would make him heedless of opposition and difficulties: a Pontiff whose reign should be long enough to make his influences felt, and encourage his successors to continue the work of reform. This was the mission of Saint Gregory VII. This mission was prepared for by holiness of life. It is always so with those whom God destines to be the instruments of his greatest works. Gregory or, as he was then called, Hildebrand, left the world and became a monk of the celebrated Monastery of Cluny, in France. It was there, and in the two thousand Abbeys which were affiliated with it, that were alone to be then found zeal for the liberty of the Church and the genuine traditions of the monastic life. It was there, that, for upwards of a hundred years and under the four great Abbots, Odo, Maiolus, Odilo and Hugh, God had been secretly providing for the regeneration of Christian morals. Yes, we may well say secretly, for no one would have thought that the instruments of the holiest of reforms were to be found in those monasteries which existed in almost every part of Europe, and had affiliated with Cluny for no other motive than because Cluny was the sanctuary of every monastic virtue. It was to Cluny itself that Hildebrand fled when he left the world. He felt sure that he would find there a shelter from the scandals that then prevailed.
The illustrious Abbot Hugh was not long in discovering the merits of his new disciple, and the young Italian was made Prior of the great French Abbey. A stranger came one day to the gate of the monastery and sought hospitality. It was Bruno, Bishop of Toul, who had been nominated Pope by the Emperor Henry III. Hildebrand could not restrain himself on seeing this new candidate for the Apostolic See — of this Pope whom Rome, which alone has the right to choose its own bishop, had neither chosen nor heard of. He plainly told Bruno that he must not accept the keys of Heaven from the hand of an emperor who was bound in conscience to submit to the canonical election of the Holy City. Bruno, who was afterwards Saint Leo IX, humbly acquiesced to the advice given him by the Prior of Cluny, and both set out for Rome. The elect of the emperor became the elect of the Roman Church, and Hildebrand prepared to return to Cluny, but the new Pontiff would not hear of his departure and obliged him to accept the title and duties of Archdeacon of the Roman Church. This high post would soon have raised him to the Papal throne, had he wished it. But Hildebrands only ambition was to break the fetters that kept the Church from being free, and prepare the reform of Christendom. The influence he had, he used in procuring the election, canonical and independent of imperial favour, of Pontiffs who were willing and determined to exercise their authority for the extirpation of scandals.
After Saint Leo IX came Victor II, Stephen IX, Nicholas II and Alexander II — all of whom were worthy of their exalted position. But he who had thus been the very soul of the Pontificate under five Popes had at length to accept the tiara himself. His noble heart was afflicted at the presentiment of the terrible contests that awaited him, but his refusals, his endeavours to evade the heavy burden of solicitude for all the Churches, were unavailing and the new Vicar of Christ was made known to the world, under the name of Gregory VII. “Gregory” means vigilance, and never did man better realise the name. He had to contend with brute force personified in a daring and crafty emperor whose life was stained with every sort of crime, and who held the Church in his grasp as a vulture does its prey. In no part of the Empire would a bishop be allowed to hold his See unless he had received investiture from the emperor by the ring and crosier. Such was Henry IV of Germany, and his example encouraged the other princes of the Empire to trample on the liberty of canonical elections by the same iniquitous measures. The two-fold scandal of simony and incontinence was still frequent among the clergy.
Gregorys immediate predecessors had, by courageous zeal, checked the evil. But not one of them had ventured to confront the fomenter of all these abuses — the emperor. That great contest, with its perils and anxieties, was left for Gregory, and history tells us how fearlessly he accepted it. The first three years of his Pontificate were, however, comparatively tranquil. Gregory treated the youthful emperor with great kindness, out of regard for his father who had deserved well of the Church. He wrote him several Letters in which he gave him good advice, or affectionately expressed his confidence in the future. Henry did not allow that confidence to last long. Aware that he had to deal with a Pope whom no intimidation could induce to swerve from duty, he thought it prudent to wait a while and watch the course of events. But the restraint was unbearable. The torrent had but swollen by the self-imposed check. The enemy of the spiritual power gave full vent to his passion. Bishoprics and abbeys were again sold for the benefit of the imperial revenue. Gregory excommunicated the simoniacal prelates and Henry, imprudently defying the censures of the Church, persisted in keeping in their posts men who were resolved to follow him in all his crimes. Gregory addressed a solemn warning to the emperor, enjoining him to withdraw his support from the excommunicated prelate under penalty of himself incurring the bans of the Church. Henry, who had thrown off the mask and thought he might afford to despise the Pontiff, was unexpectedly made to tremble for the security of his throne by the revolt of Saxony in which several of the Electors of the Empire joined. He felt that a rupture with the Church at such a critical time might be fatal. He turned suppliant, besought Gregory to absolve him and made an abjuration of his past conduct in the presence of two legates sent by the Pontiff into Germany. But scarcely had the perjured monarch gained a temporary triumph over the Saxons than he recommenced hostilities with the Church. In an assembly of bishops worthy of their imperial master, he presumed to pronounce sentence of deposition against Gregory. He, shortly afterwards, entered Italy with his army, and this gave to scores of prelates an opportunity for openly declaring rebellion against the Pope who would not tolerate their scandalous lives.
Then did Gregory, in whose hands were placed those keys which signify the power of loosing and binding in Heaven and on Earth, pronounce against Henry the terrible sentence which declared him to be deprived of his crown and to have forfeited the allegiance of his subjects. To this the Pontiff added the still heavier anathema: he declared him to be cut off from the communion of the Church. By thus setting himself as a rampart of defence to Christendom which was threatened on all sides with tyranny and persecution, Gregory drew down upon himself the vengeance of every wicked passion, and even Italy was far from being as loyal to him as he had a right to expect her to be. More than one of the princes of the Peninsula sided with Henry, and as to the simoniacal prelates, they looked on him as their defender against the sword of Peter. It seemed as though Gregory would soon not have a spot in Italy on which he could set his foot in safety, but God who never abandons His Church raised up an avenger of his cause. Tuscany, and part of Lombardy, were at that time governed by the young and brave countess Matilda. This noble-hearted woman stood up in defence of the Vicar of Christ. She offered her wealth and her army to the Holy See that it might make use of them as it thought best, as long as she lived. And as to her possessions, she willed them to Saint Peter and his successors.
Matilda, then, became a check to the emperors prosperity in crime. Her influence in Italy was still strong enough to procure a refuge for the heroic Pontiff where he could be safe from the emperors power. He was enabled by her management to reach Canossa, a strong fortress near Reggio. At the same time Henry was alarmed by news of a fresh revolt in Saxony in which more than one feudal lord of the Empire took part with a view to dethrone the haughty and excommunicated tyrant. Fear again took possession of his mind and prompted him to recur to perjury. The spiritual power marred his sacrilegious plans and he flattered himself that, by offering a temporary atonement, he could soon renew the attack. He went barefooted and unattended to Canossa, garbed as a penitent, shedding hypocrite tears and suing for pardon. Gregory had compassion on his enemy and readily yielded to the intercession made for him by Hugh of Cluny and Matilda. He took off the excommunication and restored Henry to the pale of holy Church but thought it would be premature to revoke the sentence by which he had deprived him of his rights as emperor. The Pontiff contented himself with announcing his intention of assisting at the Diet which was to be held in Germany. There he would take cognizance of the grievances brought against Henry by the princes of the Empire, and then decide what was just.
Henry accepted every condition, took his oath on the Gospel, and returned to his army. He felt his hopes rekindle within him at every step he took from that dreaded fortress within whose walls he had been compelled to sacrifice his pride to his ambition. He reckoned on finding support from the bad passions of others and, to a certain extent, his calculation was verified. Such a man was sure to come to a miserable end, but Satan was too deeply interested in his success, to refuse him his support.
Meanwhile, Henry met with a rival in Germany. It was Rodolph, duke of Swabia who, in a Diet of the Electors of the Empire, was proclaimed Henrys successor. Faithful to his principles of justice, Gregory refused at first to recognise the newly elected, although his devotedness to the Church and his personal qualifications were such as to make him most worthy of the throne. The Pontiff persisted on hearing both sides, that is, the Princes and representatives of the Empire, and Henry himself. This done, he would put an end to the dispute by an equitable judgement. Rodolph strongly urged his claims and importuned the Pontiff to recognise them, but Gregory, though he loved the Duke, courageously refused his demand, assuring him that his cause should be tried at the Diet which Henry had bound himself, by his oath at Canossa, to stand by, though he had good reasons to fear its results. Three years passed on during which the Pontiffs patience and forbearance were continually and severely tried by Henrys systematic subterfuge and refusal to give guarantees against his further molesting the Church. At length, after using every means in his power to put an end to the wars that ravaged Italy and Germany, and after Henry had given unmistakeable proofs that he was impenitent and a perjurer, the Pontiff renewed the excommunication and, in a Council held at Rome, confirmed the sentence by which he had declared him deposed of his crown. At the same time Gregory ratified Rodolphs election and granted the Apostolic benediction to his adherents.
Henrys rage was at its height, and his vengeance threw off all restraint. Among the Italian prelates who had sided with the tyrant, the foremost in subservience and ambition was Guibert, Archbishop of Ravenna and, of course, there was no bitterer enemy to the Holy See. Henry made an Anti-pope of this traitor under the name of Clement III. He had his party and thus schism was added to the other trials that afflicted the Church. It was one of those terrible periods when, according to the expression of the Apocalypse, it was given to the Beast to make war with the Saints, and to overcome them (Apocalypse viii. 7). The emperor suddenly became victorious: Rodolph was slain fighting in Germany and Matildas army was defeated in Italy. Henry had then but one wish and he determined to realise it: enter Rome, banish Gregory, and set his Anti-pope on the Chair of Saint Peter.
What were the feelings of our Saint in the midst of this deluge of iniquity from which, however, the Church was to rise purified and free? Let us listen to him describing them in a letter written to his former Abbot, Saint Hugh of Cluny:
“The troubles which have come upon us are such, that even they that are living with us, not only cannot endure them, but cannot even bear to look at them. The holy king David said: According to the multitude of my sorrows in my heart, your consolations have given joy to my soul (Psalm xciii. 19), whereas to us, life is often a burden to us, and death a happiness that we sigh for. When Jesus, that loving Consoler, true God and true Man, deigns to stretch out His hand to me, His goodness brings back joy to my afflicted heart. But when He leaves me, immediately my trouble is extreme. Of myself, I am for ever dying. But insofar as He is with me, there are times when I live. When my strength wholly leaves me, I cry out to Him, saying with a mournful voice: If you had put a burden as heavy as this on Moses or Peter, they would, methinks, have sunk beneath it. What, then, can be expected of me who, compared to them, am nothing? You have then, O Lord, but one thing to do: you youryself, with your Apostle Peter, must govern the Pontificate you have imposed on me, else you will find me sink beneath the load and the Pontificate in my person be disgraced.”
These words of heartfelt grief depict the whole character of the sainted Pontiff. The one great object of his life was the reformation of society by the liberty of the Church. It was nothing but his zeal in such a cause that could have made him face this terrible situation from which he had nothing to look for in this life but heart-rending vexations. And yet, Gregory was that Father of the Christian world who, from the very commencement of his Pontificate, was full of the thought of driving the Mahometans out of Europe, and of delivering the Christians from the yoke of the Saracens. It was the inspiration taken up by his successors, and carried out under the name of the Crusades. In a Letter addressed to all the Faithful, our Saint thus speaks of the enemy of the Christian name whom he describes as being at the very gates of Constantinople, committing every kind of outrage and cruelty:
“If we love God, if we call ourselves Christians, we must grieve over such evils. But we should do more than grieve over them. Our Saviours example and the duty of fraternal charity impose upon us the obligation of giving our lives for the deliverance of our fellow-Christians. Know, then, that trusting in the mercy of God and in the might of His arm, we are doing and preparing everything in our power in order to give immediate help to the Christian Empire.” He shortly afterwards wrote to Henry who, at that time, had not shown his hostile intentions against the Church. “My admonition to the Christians of Italy and the countries beyond the Alps has been favourably received. At this moment fifty thousand men are preparing and, if they can have me to head the expedition as leader and Pontiff, they are willing to march to battle against the enemies of God and, with the " divine assistance, to go even to our Lords sepulchre.” Thus, despite his advanced age, the noble-minded Pontiff was willing to put himself at the head of the Christian army. “There is,” says he, “one thing which urges me to do this: it is the state of the Church of Constantinople, which is separated from us in what regards the dogma of the Holy Ghost and which must be brought back to union with the Apostolic See. Almost the whole of Armenia has abandoned the Catholic Faith. In a word, the greater portion of the Orientals require to know what is the faith of Peter on the various questions which are being mooted among them. The time is come for using the grace bestowed by our merciful Redeemer on Peter when he thus spoke to him: I have prayed for you, Peter, that your faith may not fail: do thou confirm your brethren (Luke xxii. 32). Our Fathers in whose footsteps we would walk, though " we be unworthy to be their successors, have more than once visited those countries that they might confirm the Catholic Faith. We, then, also feel urged, if Christ open to us a way, to undertake this expedition for the interests of the Faith, and in order to give aid to the Christians.”
With his characteristic good faith, Gregory went so far as to reckon on Henrys protecting the Church during his absence. “This design,” says he in the same letter to the emperor, “requires much counsel and powerful co-operation in case God permits us to attempt it: I therefore come to you asking you for this counsel and co-operation, and hope you will grant me them. If, by divine favour, I go, it is to you, after God, that I leave the Roman Church, that you may watch over her as a holy mother and protect her from insult. Let me know as soon as may be what, in your prudence, aided by Gods counsel, you decide on. If I had not greater confidence in you than people suppose, I should not have written this to you. But as it may happen that you may not fully believe I have the affection for you that I profess, I appeal to the Holy Spirit who can do all things, I beseech Him to make you understand, in His own way, how attached I am to you, and that He may so guide your soul as to disappoint the desires of the wicked and strengthen the hopes of the good.”
The interview at Canossa took place in less than three years from the date of the above letter, but at the time he wrote it Gregorys hopes for carrying out the expedition were so well grounded that he acquainted the Countess Matilda with his intention. He wrote to her as follows:
“The matter which engrosses my thoughts, and the desire I have to cross the seas in order to give succour to the Christians who are being slain as brute beasts by the pagans, makes me seem strange to many people and I fear they think me guilty of a sort of levity. But it costs me nothing to confide it to you, my dearly beloved daughter, whose prudence I esteem more than words could express. After you have perused the letters which I am sending to the countries beyond the Alps, if you have any advice to offer or, what is better, any aid to give to the cause of God your Creator, exert yourself to the utmost: for if, as men say, it be a grand thing to die for ones country, it is grander and nobler to sacrifice this mortal flesh of ours for Christ who is Eternal Life. I feel convinced that many soldiers will aid us in this expedition. I have grounds for believing that our Empress (Agnes, the saintly mother of Henry) intends going with us, and would fain take you with her. Your mother (the Countess Beatrice) will remain here in Italy to protect our common interests, and all things thus arranged, we will, with Christs help, be enabled to set out. By coming here to satisfy her devotion, the Empress, especially if she have you to help her, will doubtless encourage many to join in this enterprise. As for me, honoured with the company of such noble sisters, I will willingly cross the seas, ready to lay down my life for Christ with you from whom I would not be separated in our eternal country. Send me a speedy answer upon this project, as also regarding your coming to Rome. And may the Almighty God bless you and give you to advance from virtue to virtue, that thus the common Mother may rejoice in you for many long years to come!”
The project on which Gregory set his heart with so much earnestness was not a mere scheme suggested by his own greatness of soul. It was a presentiment infused into his mind by God. The troubles he had nearer home and which he so heroically combated left him no time for a long expedition. He had to engage with an enemy who was not a Turk, but a Christian. Still, the Crusade so dear to his heart was not far off. Urban II, his second successor, and like himself a monk of Cluny, was soon to arouse Christian Europe and give battle to the infidels. But as this subject has led us to mention Matildas name, we take the opportunity thus afforded us of entering more fully into the character of our great Pontiff. We will find that this illustrious champion of the Churchs liberty, with all his elevation of purpose and all his untiring zeal in what concerned the interests of Christendom, was as solicitous about the spiritual advancement of a single soul as any director could be. Writing to the Countess Matilda he says: “He who fathoms the secrets of the human heart, he alone knows, and knows better than I do myself, how interested I am in what concerns your salvation. I think you understand that I feel myself bound to take care of you for the sake of so many people in whose interest I have been compelled, by charity, to deter you when you were thinking of leaving them in order to provide for the salvation of your own soul. As I have often told you, and will keep on telling you, in the words of Heavens herald, charity seeks not her own (1 Corinthians xiii. 5). But as the principal armour with which I have provided you in your battle against the prince of this world is the frequent receiving of our Lords body and a firm confidence in the protection of His Blessed Mother, I will now add what Saint Ambrose says on the subject of Holy Communion.”
The Pontiff then gives her two quotations from the writings of this Holy Father, to which he also adds others from Saint Gregory the Great and Saint John Chrysostom on the blessings we derive from receiving the Sacrament of the Eucharist. He then continues: “Therefore, my daughter, we should have recourse to this greatest of the Sacraments, this greatest of all remedies. I have written all this to you, beloved daughter of Blessed Peter, with a view to increase your faith and confidence when you approach to Communion. This is the treasure, and this is the gift, more precious than gold and gems, which your soul, out of love for the King of Heaven, your Father, expects from me, although you would have received the same in a far better way and one more worthy of your acceptance, had you applied to some other of Gods ministers. With regard to the Mother of God to whose care I have confided you for the past, the present and the future until we are permitted to see her in Heaven as we desire, what can I say? How can I say anything worthy of Her whom Heaven and Earth are ever praising, and yet never so much as she deserves? Yes, hold this as a most certain truth: that as she is grander and better and holier than all mothers, so is she more merciful and loving to all sinners who are sorry for their sins. Be, then, determined never to commit sin. Prostrate yourself and weep before her with a contrite and humble heart, and I unhesitatingly promise you this: you will find her more ready to assist you, and more affectionate, than any mother on Earth ever was to her child.”
A Pontiff like this who, amid all his occupations, could devote himself with such paternal zeal to the advancement of one single soul, was sure to be on the watch for men whose piety and learning promised well for the interests of the Church. It is true, there were very few such men, in those times, but Gregory would find them out wherever they might be. The great Saint Anselm who was living in the peaceful retirement of his Monastery at Bec had not escaped the watchful eye of the Pontiff who wrote him these touching words amid the troubles of the year 1079: “The good odour of your fruits has spread even to us. We give thanks to God, and we embrace you with affection in the love of Christ, for we are well assured of the benefits which the Church of God will derive from your studies, and of the succour which through Gods mercy, she will receive from your prayers, united as they are with those who are of a like spirit. You know, my brother, of how much avail with God is the prayer of one just man. How much more, then, must not avail the prayer of many just ones? No, we cannot doubt it. It obtains what it asks. The authority of Truth Himself obliges us to believe it. It is He who said: Knock, and it will be opened to you! Knock with simplicity of heart. Ask with simplicity of heart for those things which are pleasing to Him. Then will it be opened to you, then will you receive. And it is thus that the prayer of the just is graciously heard. We therefore beg of you, brother, of you and your monks, that you beseech God in assiduous prayer that He may vouchsafe to deliver, from the tyranny of heretics, His Church and us who, though unworthy, are placed over it. And that, dispelling the error which blinds our enemies, He may lead them back to the path of truth.”
But Gregorys attention was not confined to persons of such eminence and learning as a Matilda or an Anselm. His quick eye discerned every Christian, however humble his station, who had suffered persecution for the cause of holy Church. He honoured and loved him far more than he would the bravest soldier who fought for earthly glory and got it at the risk of his life. Let us read the following letter which he wrote to a poor priest of Milan named Liprand, who had been cruelly maimed by the Simoniacs:
“If we venerate the memory of those Saints who died after their limbs had been severed by the sword. If we celebrate the sufferings of those whom neither the sword nor torture could separate from the Faith of Christ: you, who have had your nose and ears cut off for his Name, you deserve still greater praise, for that you have merited a grace which, if it be accompanied by your perseverance, gives you a perfect resemblance to the Saints. Your body is no longer perfect in all its parts, but the interior man who is renewed from day to day is now grander than ever. Your outward face is maimed, and therefore disfigured. But the image of God which consists in the brightness of virtue has become more graceful by your wounds, and its beauty heightened by the deformity which men have brought on your features. Does not the Church, speaking of herself, say: I am black, ye daughters of Jerusalem? (Canticles i. 4). If, then, your interior beauty has not been impaired by these cruel mutilations, neither has your priestly character which manifests itself rather by the perfection of virtue than by that of the body. Did not the Emperor Constantine show his veneration for a bishop who had had one of his eyes pulled out? Was he not seen to kiss the wound? Have we not the examples of the Fathers and the early history of the Church telling us that the martyrs were allowed to continue the exercise of the sacred ministry even after their limbs had been mutilated? You then, Martyr of Christ, must confide in the Lord without reserve. You must congratulate yourself on having made an advance in your priesthood. It was conferred on you by the holy oil, but now you have sealed it with your own blood. The more your body has lost, the more must you preach what is good, and sow that Word which produces a hundredfold. We know that the enemies of holy Church are your enemies and persecutors. Fear them not and tremble not in their presence, for we lovingly hold both yourself and everything that belongs to you under our own protection and that of the Apostolic See. And if you should at any time find it necessary to have recourse to us, we now at once admit your appeal and will receive you with joy and every mark of honour when you visit us and this Holy See.”
Such was Gregory, keeping up the simplicity of the monk amid all his occupations as Pope. And what engrossing occupations were not these, even forgetting that fearful contest with tyranny and crime which cost him his life! We have already mentioned his project of the Crusade which, at a later period, was enough to immortalise the name of Urban II. As to his other labours for the good of religion in every part of Christendom, we may truly say that at no period of the Churchs existence did the Papacy exercise a wider, more active, or more telling influence, than during the twelve years of his Pontificate. By his immense correspondence he furthered the interests of the Church in Germany, Italy, France, England and Spain. He aided the rising Churches of Denmark, Sweden and Norway. He testified his vigilant and tender solicitude for the welfare of Hungary, Bohemia, Poland, Serbia, even for Russia. Despite the rupture between Rome and Byzantium, the Pontiff withheld not his paternal intervention with a view to remove the schism which kept the Greek Church out of the centre of unity. On the coast of Africa, he, by great vigilance, succeeded in maintaining three bishoprics which had survived the Mussulman invasion. In order to knit the Latin Church into closer unity by greater uniformity in prayer, he abolished the Gothic Liturgy that was used in Spain and forbade the introduction of the Greek Liturgy into Bohemia. What work was not all this for one man! And what a martyrdom he had to go through!
Let us resume our history of his trials. The Church and society were to be saved by him but, like his Divine Master, he had to drink of the torrent in the way (Psalm cix. 7) as the condition of his mission being a successful one. We have seen how his defenders were defeated in battle, how he was menaced by the conqueror who had once stood trembling in his presence, and how there was set up in opposition an Anti-pope whose side was taken by unworthy prelates. Henry marched on towards Rome, taking with him the false vicar of Christ. He set fire to that part of the city which would expose the Vatican to danger. Gregory sent his blessing to his terrified people and, immediately, the fire took the contrary direction and died out. Enthusiasm was for a while the feeling of the Romans who have so often been ungrateful to their Pontiff without whom, their Rome, with all its glory, sinks into a poor contemptible town. Henry was afraid to consummate his sacrilege. He therefore sent word to the Romans that he only asked one condition: it was that they should induce Gregory to consecrate him emperor of Germany, and that he would forever be a devoted son of the Church : as to the ignoble phantom he had set up in opposition to the true Pope, he (Henry) would see to his being soon forgotten. This petition was presented to Gregory by the whole city. The Pontiff made them this reply: “Too well do I know the kings treachery. Let him first make atonement to God and to the Church which he tramples beneath his feet. Then will I absolve him, if penitent, and crown the convert with the imperial diadem.”
The Romans were earnest in their entreaties but this was the only answer they could elicit from the inflexible guardian of Christian justice. Henry was about to withdraw his troops when the fickle Romans, being bribed by money from Byzantium (for, then, as ever, all schisms were in fellowship against the Papacy) abandoned their king and Father, and delivered up the keys of the city to him who enslaved their souls. Gregory was thus obliged to seek refuge in the Castle of SantAngelo, taking with him, into that fortress-prison, the liberty of holy Church. Thence, or perhaps a few days previously to his retiring there, he wrote this admirable letter in the year 1084. It is addressed to all the faithful, and may be considered as the last Will and Testament of this glorious Pontiff:
“The kings of the Earth and the princes of the priests have met together against Christ (Psalm ii. 2) the Son of the Almighty God and against His Apostle Peter, to the end that they may destroy the Christian religion and propagate the wickedness of heresy in every land. But, by the mercy of God, they have not been able with all their threats, and cruelties, and proffers of worldly glory, to seduce those that put their confidence in the Lord. Wicked conspirators have raised up their hands against us for no other reason than because we would not pass over in silence the perils of holy Church, nor tolerate them that blush not to make a slave of the very Spouse of God. In every country the poorest woman is allowed, yes, she is assisted by the law of the land, to choose her own husband. And yet, nowadays, holy Church, the Spouse of God and our Mother, is not allowed to be united to her Spouse as the Divine Law commands, and as she herself wishes. It cannot be that we should suffer the children of this Church to be slaves to heretics, adulterers and tyrants as though these were their parents. Hence we have had to endure all manner of evil treatment, perils and unheard-of cruelties, as you will learn from our Legates.
You know, Brethren, that it was said to the Prophet : Cry from the top of the mountain, cry, cease not! I, then — urged irresistibly, laying human respect aside and raising my mind above every earthly consideration — I preach the Gospel, I cry out, yes, I cry out unceasingly, and I make known to you, that the Christian religion, the true Faith which the Son of God, who came down on the Earth, has taught us by our Fathers, is in danger of being corrupted by the violence of secular power: that it is on the way to destruction and to the loss of its primitive character being thus exposed to be scoffed at, not only by Satan, but by Jews, and Turks, and pagans. The very pagans are observers of their laws, though these cannot profit the souls salvation, neither have they been guaranteed by miracles as ours have been, to which our Eternal King has borne testimony. They keep their laws and believe them. We Christians, intoxicated with the love of the world and led astray by vain ambition, we make every principle of religion and justice give way to covetousness and pride. We seem as though we had neither law nor sense, for we have not the earnestness our Fathers had for our salvation, and for the glory of both the present and future life. We do not even make them the object of our hopes. If there be some still left who fear God, they only care for their own salvation, and the common good seems not to concern them. Where do we now find persons who labour and toil, or expose their lives, by fatigue, out of the motive of the fear or love of the Omnipotent God? whereas we see soldiers of this worlds armies braving all manner of dangers for their masters, their friends, and even their subjects!
There are thousands of men to be found who face death for the sake of their liege lord, but when the King of heaven, our Redeemer, is in question, so far from being lavish of their lives, Christians dare not even incur the displeasure of a few scoffers. If there be some, (and, thanks to the mercy of God, there are still a few such, left among us) — if, we repeat, there be some who for the love of the Christian law dare to resist the wicked to their face, not only are they unsupported by their brethren, but they are accused of imprudence and indiscretion, and are treated as fools. We, therefore, who are bound by our position to destroy vice and implant virtue in the hearts of our brethren, we pray and beseech you, in the Lord Jesus who redeemed us, that you would consider within yourselves and understand why it is that we have to suffer such anguish and tribulation from the enemies of the Christian religion. From the day when, by the Divine will, the Mother-Church, despite my great unworthiness and (as God is my witness) despite my own wish, placed me on the Apostolic throne — the one object of all my labours has been that the Spouse of God, our Mistress and Mother, should recover her just rights in order that she may be free, chaste and Catholic. But such a line of conduct must have caused extreme displeasure to the old enemy, and therefore it is that he has marshalled against us them that are his members, and has stirred up against us a world-wide opposition. Hence it is that there have been used against us, and against the Apostolic See, efforts of a more violent character than any that have ever been attempted since the days of Constantine the Great. But there is nothing surprising in all this: it is but natural, that the nearer we approach to the time of Antichrist, the more furious will be the attempts to annihilate the Christian religion.”
These words vividly describe to us the holy indignation and grief of the great Pontiff who, at this terrible crisis, stood almost alone against the enemies of God. He was weighed down, he was crushed, by adversity. But conquered, no! From the fortress within whose walls he had withdrawn the majesty of the Vicar of Christ, he could hear the impious cheers of his people as they followed Henry to the Vatican Basilica where, at Saint Peters Confession, the mock pope was awaiting his arrival. It was the Palm Sunday of 1085. The sacrilege was committed. On the previous day Guibert had dared to ascend the Papal throne in the Basilica of Saint John Lateran. And on the Sunday, while the people held in their hands the Palms that glorify the Christ whose Vicar was Gregory, the Anti-pope took the crown of the Christian Empire and put it on the head of the excommunicated Henry. But God was preparing an avenger of His Church. The Pontiff was kept a close prisoner in the fort and it seemed as though his enemy would soon make him a victim of his rage when the report suddenly spread through Rome that Bobert Guiscard, the valiant Norman chieftain, was marching on towards the city. He had come to fight for the captive Pontiff and deliver Rome from the tyranny of the Germans. The false Caesar and his false Pope were panic-stricken. They fled, leaving the perjured city to expiate its odious treason in the horrors of a ruthless pillage.
Gregorys heart bled at seeing his people thus treated. It was not in his power to prevent the depredations of the barbarian troops. They had done their work of delivering him from his enemies, but they were not satisfied. They had come to Rome to chastise her, but now they wanted booty, and they were determined to have it. Not only was the Saint powerless to repress these marauders. He was in danger of again falling into Henrys hands, who was meditating a return to Rome, for he made sure that the peoples angry humour would secure him a welcome back, and that the Normans would withdraw from the city as soon as it had no more to give them. Gregory, therefore, overwhelmed with grief, left the capital and, shaking off the dust from his feet, he repaired to Monte Cassino where he sought shelter and a few hours of repose with the sons of the great Patriarch Saint Benedict. The contrast of the peaceful years he spent when a young monk at Cluny, with the storms that had so thickly beset his Pontificate, was sure to present itself to his mind. A wanderer and fugitive, and abandoned by all save a few faithful and devoted souls, he was passing through the several stations of his Passion, but his Calvary was not far off, and God was soon to admit him into rest eternal. Before descending the holy mount, he was honoured with the miraculous manifestation which had been witnessed on several previous occasions. Gregory was at the altar offering up the Holy Sacrifice when suddenly a white dove was seen resting on his shoulder with its beak turned towards his ear, as though it were speaking to him. It was not difficult to recognise, under this expressive symbol, the guidance which the saintly Pontiff received from the Holy Ghost.
It was the early part of the year 1085. Gregory repaired to Salerno where his troubles and life were to be brought to a close. His bodily strength was gradually failing. He insisted, however, on going through the ceremony of the dedication of the Church of Saint Matthew the Evangelist, whose body was kept at Salerno. He addressed a few words in a feeble voice to the assembled people. He then received the Body and Blood of Christ. Fortified with this life-giving Viaticum, he returned to the house where he was staying and threw himself upon the couch, from which he was never to rise again. There he lay, like Jesus on His Cross, robbed of everything and abandoned by almost the whole world. His last thoughts were for Holy Church. He mentioned to the few Cardinals and Bishops who were with him, three from whom he would recommend his successor to be chosen: Desiderius, Abbot of Monte Cassino who succeeded him under the title of Victor III, Otho of Chatillon, a monk of Cluny who was afterwards Urban II, Victors successor, and the faithful Legate Hugh of Die whom Gregory had made Archbishop of Lyons.
The by-standers asked the dying Pontiff what were his wishes regarding those whom he had excommunicated. Here again, he imitated our Saviour on His Cross. He exercised both mercy and justice: “Excepting,” said he, “Henry, and Guibert the usurper of the Apostolic See, and them that connive at their injustice and impiety, I absolve and bless all those who have faith in my power as being that of the holy Apostles Peter and Paul.” The thought of the pious and heroic Matilda coming to his mind, he entrusted this devoted daughter of the Roman Church to the care of the courageous Anselm of Lucca, thereby imitating (as the biographer of this holy Bishop remarks) our dying Jesus who consigned Mary to His Beloved Disciple John. Gregorys last blessing to Matilda drew down upon her thirty years of success and victory.
Though so near his end, yet was Gregory as full of paternal solicitude for the Church as ever he had been. Calling to him, one by one, the faithful few who stood round his couch, he made them promise on oath that they would never acknowledge Henry as emperor until he had made satisfaction to the Church. Summing up all his energy, he solemnly forbade them to recognise anyone as Pope unless he were elected canonically and in accordance with the rules laid down by the holy Fathers. Then, after a moment of devout recollectedness, he expressed his conformity to the Divine Will (which had ordained that his Pontificate should be one long martyrdom) and said: “I have loved justice and hated iniquity: for which cause, I die in exile!” One of the bishops who were present respectfully made him this reply: “No, my Lord, you cannot die in exile, for, holding the place of Christ and the holy Apostles, you have had given to you the nations for your inheritance, and the utmost parts of the Earth for your possession.” Sublime words, but Gregory heard them not: his soul had winged its flight to Heaven, and had received a martyrs immortal crown.
So that Gregory was conquered by death, as Christ Himself had been, but as the Master triumphed over death, so too would he have his disciple triumph. Christianity, which had been insulted in so many forms, rose again in all its grandeur. Nay, on the very day that Gregory breathed his last at Salerno, Heaven seemed to give a pledge of this resurrection for on that day — the 25th of May 1085 — Alphonsus VI entered with his victorious troops into the city of Toledo and there, after four centuries of slavery under the Saracen yoke, he replanted the Cross of Christ. But the Church had need of some one who would take Gregorys place in defending her against oppression. The need was supplied. The martyrdom of our Saint was like a seed that produced Pontiffs imbued with his spirit. As he had prepared his own predecessors, he also prepared worthy successors. There are few names on the list of the Popes more glorious than those that begin with Victor III (Gregorys immediate successor), and continue to Boniface VIII inclusively, in whom was recommenced the struggle for which our great Pontiff so heroically lived and died. Scarcely had death put an end to his trials in this valley of tears than victory came to the Church, for her enemies were defeated, her sacred law of celibacy was everywhere re-enforced, and the canonical election of her bishops was secured by the suppression of investitures and simony.
Gregory had been the instrument used by God for the reformation of the Christian world, and although his memory be held in benediction by all true children of the Church, yet his mission was too grand and too grandly fulfilled not to draw down upon him the hatred of Satan. The Prince of this world (John, xii. 31) hen took his revenge. Gregory was, of course, detested by heretics, but that could scarcely be called an insult: he must be rendered odious to Catholics. Catholics must be made ashamed of him. The devil succeeded and, it may be, beyond his expectations. The Church had passed her judgement, but her judgement, her canonisation, had no weight with these cowardly, temporising, half Catholics, and they persisted in calling the Saint simply and reproachfully, “Gregory the Seventh.” Governments styling themselves Catholic forbade his being honoured as a Saint. There were even bishops who issued Pastorals to the same effect. The most eloquent of French preachers declared his Pontificate and conduct to be un-Christian.
There was a time, and that not so very long ago, when these lines would have exposed the writer to a heavy penalty as being contrary to the law of the land. The Lessons of todays feast were suppressed by the Parliament of Paris in 1729, and those who dared to recite them were to be punished by the forfeiture of their property. Thank God all this is now passed and the name of Saint Gregory VII is honoured in every country where the Roman Liturgy is in use. Yes, this glorious name will remain now to the end of the world on the universal Calendar of holy Church as one of the brightest glories of Paschal Time. May it produce the same enthusiastic admiration, and bring the same blessings, upon the faithful of these our times as it did on our Catholic forefathers of the Middle Ages!
* * * * *
Our Paschal joy is increased by your triumph, Gregory, for in you we recognise an image of Him who, by the announcement of His glorious Resurrection, raised the world from its fallen state. Divine Providence had prepared your Pontificate and made it an era of regeneration for society which was then oppressed by the tyranny of barbarism. Your courage was founded on confidence in Jesus word and nothing could daunt you. Your reign on the Apostolic See was one long combat, and because you hated iniquity and loved justice, you had to die an exile. But in you was fulfilled the prophecy which had been spoken of your Divine Master: “If he will lay down his life for sin, he will see a long-lived seed” (Isaias liii. 10), A glorious succession of six and thirty Popes continued the work which thy heroism had begun: the Church had regained her liberty, and Might was made subservient to Right. It was a period of triumph. It passed. War was again declared, and has never since ceased. Kings and emperors and governments have rebelled against the Spiritual Power. They have thrown off obedience to the Vicar of Christ. They have refused to ackmowledge the control of any authority on Earth. The people, on their part, have revolted against their governments, that is, against a power which has ceased to have any visible and sacred connection with God. And this two-fold revolt is now hurrying society on to destruction.
This world belongs to Christ, for He is the King of kings, and Lord of lords (1 Timothy vi. 15) and to Him has been given all power in Heaven and on Earth (Matthew xxviii. 18). It matters not who they may be that rebel against Him. Be they kings or be they people, they must inevitably be chastised, just as were the Jewish people who said in their pride: “We will not have this man to reign over us!” (Luke xix. 14). Pray, O Gregory, for this world which you rescued from barbarism, and which is now striving to relapse into degradation. The men of this generation are ever talking of Liberty. It is in the name of this pretended Liberty that they have un-Christianised society, and the only means now left for maintaining order is outward violence and force. You triumphed over brute force by making the laws of Right acknowledged and loved. You gave the world what it had lost — the Liberty of the sons of God, the Liberty of doing ones duty — and it lasted for ages. Come, noble-hearted Pontiff, aid this Europe of ours a second time. Beseech our Lord Jesus Christ to forgive the wickedness of them that have driven Him from the world and scoff at His threat of returning on the day of His triumph and His justice. Yes, pray Him to have mercy on the thousands among us who call themselves Christians — and perhaps are so, yet who are led astray by the absurd sophistry of the times, by blind prejudice, by a godless education, by high-sounding and vague words, and who call by the name of progress the system of keeping men as far as possible from the End for which God created them.
From the abode of peace where you are now resting after your labours, look with an eye of affectionate pity on Holy Church whose path is beset by countless difficulties. Everything conspires against her: remnants of by-gone laws that were made in times of persecution, the frenzy of pride which chafes at everything that favours subordination of rank or authority, and the determination to secularise society by scouting every element of the supernatural. In the midst of this storm of irreligion, the Rock on which you, O Gregory, once held the place of Peter, is furiously beaten by the waves of persecution. Pray for our Holy Father, the Vicar of Christ. Pray that the threatening scourge may be turned from Rome. The followers of Satan, as Saint John prophesies in the Apocalypse, are come upon the breadth of the Earth and have encompassed the camp of the Saints and the beloved City (Apocalypse xx. 8). This Holy City was your Spouse when you were Pontiff here on Earth. Watch over her now. Disconcert the plots that are laid for her ruin. Rouse the zeal of the children of the Church that, by their courage and generous offerings, they may labour for the noblest cause on Earth.
Pray, too, for the Episcopal Order of which the Apostolic See is the source. The Anointed of the Lord have never had greater need of your intercession than now when they have to contend with a world that has openly divorced itself from the laws of God and His Church. May they be endued with strength from on high, courageous in the confession of Truth and zealous in warning the faithful against the errors that are now so rife against Faith and Morals. The power of the Church, in these our days, is confined to the sanctuary of the souls of her devoted children. External support is everywhere denied her. The Holy Ghost whose mission is to maintain the Church of Christ will indeed assist her even to the consummation of the world, but He does His work by instruments, and these must be men who are detached from the world, men who are not afraid to be unpopular, and men who are resolved, at every risk, to proclaim the teachings of the Sovereign Pontiff. Great, by the mercy of God, is now the number of Pastors of the Church who are all that He would have them be, who is the Prince of Pastors (Peter v. 4) as Saint Peter calls him. Pray for all that all may, like you love justice and hate iniquity, love truth and hate error, and fear neither exile, nor persecution, nor death: for the disciple is not above the Master!